7 Chapter 7 (Bad Essays)

One of the problems that students frequently encounter is that they get caught in an echo chamber. It is easy to surround ourselves with people who agree with us or with those who do not challenge our opinions. It is even easier to find bad arguments that are emotionally persuasive. However, unless we have a reason to slow down and look at these arguments more objectively, they simply reinforce the poorly formed notions we already have. This chapter contains examples of “bad” academic writing. Each will be given without commentary and then will have the commentary added in on the next pages.

 

“The Swift Thief”

When you think of terrifying dinosaurs, you probably think of Tyrannosaurus Rex or Spinosaurus, but the real dangers were much smaller. The most terrifying dinosaur might very well have been not much bigger than you or me, but it was smart and equipped with a slashing claw that could disembowel anyone it chose to attack. I am referring, of course, to the Velociraptor.

Contrary to the name of the famous park, Velociraptors lived in the Cretaceous period, not the Jurassic. They were the type of dinosaur technically called therapods, and therapods were all three-toed vicious killers. If any of them were alive today, then people probably could not have evolved. While the big boys get the attention, the real terrors were a little bit smaller. We have proof that velociraptors hunted in packs, and “was probably one of the more intelligent dinosaurs, because it had a large brain proportionate to its body size” (“Velociraptor”).

These sleek hunters were fast, able to reach speeds close to a wolf, and “The Velociraptor had curved 6-inch razor-sharp claws on each hand” (“Velociraptor”). Just imagine this terrifying creature coming at you. Now imagine turning and running away—only to run right into another member of its pack. There would be no escape from this scale-covered death machine.

So, keep your lumbering T-rexes. Marvel if you want at the gentle rhinos of the prehistoric world, the Triceratops. For my money, the most exciting dinosaur was the “speedy thief” known as Velociraptor.

 

Works Cited

“Velociraptor.” Jurassic World: Intel. http://www.jurassicworld.com/intel/dinosaur/velociraptor

 

Now, here is the same essay with some very basic commentary on the right.

When you think of terrifying dinosaurs, you probably think (1) of Tyrannosaurus Rex or Spinosaurus, but the real dangers were much smaller. (1) Don’t pretend you are psychic! You have no idea what I think about. For example, I actually know something about nature, so large herbivores scare me more than predators—hippos and cape buffalo kill hundreds every year in Africa, for example.
The most terrifying dinosaur might very well have been not much bigger than you or me (2), (2) It was actually about the size of a turkey. The movie series greatly exaggerated a lot of features, including size.
but it was smart and equipped with a slashing claw that could disembowel anyone it chose to attack (3). (3) There is actually some dispute as to whether its claw was suited to slashing. It was more likely a puncturing weapon. Without a source, though, the student has no support for xir position.
I am referring, of course, to the Velociraptor. Contrary to the name of the famous park, Velociraptors lived in the Cretaceous period, not the Jurassic. (4) (4) Underlined text is currently plagiarized, as no source is provided.
They were the type of dinosaur technically called therapods, and therapods were all three-toed vicious killers. (5) (5) Still plagiarized, and not really. An entire branch of therapods known as the therizinosaurs might have been herbivorous. Plus, see below.
If any of them were alive today, then people probably could not have evolved (6). (6) There are therapods alive today. Many of them. They are called birds, and I’d need an argument to see a parrot as a vicious killer preventing humans from evolving.
While the big boys (7) (7) This is strangely sexist and serves no particular advantage.
get the attention (8), the real terrors were a little bit smaller. (8) No evidence is even provided to support the assertion that larger dinosaurs get more attention, either.
We have proof that velociraptors hunted in packs (9),

 

(9) Not as of 12/30/2020. There is proof of very limited social behavior in Deinonychus, a larger and closely-related species, but this is like saying that because Komodo dragons sometimes share a kill that we have proof that that geckos hunt in packs. Also, where is that proof in this essay? It’s not cited.
and “was probably one of the more intelligent dinosaurs, because it had a large brain proportionate to its body size” (“Velociraptor” (10)). (10) This is the Jurassic World webpage, as in from the movie series!

 

These sleek hunters were fast, able to reach speeds close to a wolf (11), (11) No source is provided for this (it is not included on the webpage referenced). Nor does “I already knew this” count, because a lot of what this person things xe knows is turning out to be wrong.
and “The Velociraptor had curved 6-inch razor-sharp claws on each hand” (“Velociraptor” (12)). (12) Maybe the CGI critters in Jurassic World had six-inch claws, but even the “big” toe claw on these creatures was smaller than this.
Just imagine this terrifying creature coming at you (13). (13) I’m imagining being perfectly safe because it died out more than 70 million years ago. These little “imagine” scenarios are acceptable to illustrate an informal point, but have no place in academic writing as the basis of an argument.
Now imagine turning and running away—only to run right into another member of its pack (14). (14) Again with the insistence on the pack thing…still without a source!
There would be no escape from this scale-covered death machine (15). (15) Beyond the excessively dramatic language, Velociraptor was likely covered in feathers. Scientific advisors even told the Jurassic Park people this back in the 90s. The film makers kept them scaly to be scarier.
So, keep your lumbering T-rexes (16). (16) T. rex likely did not lumber.
Marvel if you want at the gentle rhinos of the prehistoric world, the Triceratops (17). (17) Rhinos are gentle? Since when? Or were T. horridus gentle? How do we know this?
For my money (18), (18) This is supposed to be a college essay, not a casino.
the most exciting dinosaur was the “speedy thief” known as Velociraptor (19). (19) How does the author know the translation of Velociraptor, again?

So, this is a classic example of an essay that is undermined by an overconfident student writing from what xe thinks xe knows, going for drama instead of information. It might be a lovely essay to turn in for a 7th grade English class, but it’s just not academic writing. Next, here is a passage from what would presumably be a much longer essay. It makes some of the same mistakes, but it also has other failings.

“Giants of the Ancient Sea” Excerpt

Most people know about dinosaurs, but did you know that while dinosaurs were walking on land, there were giant reptiles swimming in the sea? There were! These magnificent creatures were called plesiosaurs, and while they were not dinosaurs, they swam alongside them.

Millions of years ago, massive dinosaurs made the earth tremble as they walked. One of them was brontosaurus, the thunder lizard. Another was the biggest dinosaur of all time, brachiosaurus. These giants were from a group called the sauropods, and they all had the same body plan—small head, long neck, round body, and sweeping tail. This same body plan worked just as well in the water. The plesiosaurs looked like the famed Loch Ness Monster, with a snake-like neck on a massive body. Unlike the Loch Ness Monster, though, plesiosaurs were real! Sadly, though, they have no living relatives (“Baby”).

Plesiosaurs were more than just sea monsters, though. They were likely caring parents. First, it’s not like a flippered creature is going to crawl onto land in order to lay eggs. This means that the plesiosaurs likely needed to give birth to live young, just like mammals. Mammals are famous for the fact that we care for our young. Additionally, a study done by Robin O’Keefe discovered that newborn plesiosaurs needed care to survive. Robin explains “Our study also reaches the novel conclusion that plesiosaur fetal bone grew extremely quickly, sacrificing bone strength for growth rate. Plesiosaur babies may have needed maternal care for protection.” She points out that while plesiosaurs were big, they could not have fended for themselves.

Works Cited

“Baby Plesiosaurs Were Weak Swimmers: New Analysis of Pregnant Plesiosaur Fossil on View at Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.” NHM.org. 2 Jan 2019.

 

Once more, with the original text on the left and commentary on the right.

Most people know about dinosaurs, but did you know that while dinosaurs were walking on land, there were giant reptiles swimming in the sea? (1) (1) Yes, I did know that. Okay, I guess we’re done! Seriously, rhetorical questions like this are silly, because there is no way to account for a reader’s response.
There were! These magnificent creatures were called plesiosaurs (2), (2) Only some of them were plesiosaurs. Some were also ichthyosaurs, and others were mosasaurs. Calling all of them plesiosaurs is like saying “it’s a mammal and it swims, so it must be a whale.” Nope. Otters and Michael Phelps, at least, would like a word with you.
and while they were not dinosaurs, they swam alongside them (3). (3) Grammatically, right now the dinosaurs are also swimming with the plesiosaurs. While there’s a loophole here with Hesperornis (and maybe Spinosaurus), there is as of yet no evidence of Tyrannosaurus rex paddling along or of Stegosaurus stenops splashing around
Millions of years ago, massive dinosaurs made the earth tremble as they walked. (4) (4) Underlined text is currently plagiarized, as no source is provided. “Dr. S, I already knew this!” Well, what you thought you knew was wrong (see below), and you’d still need support.
One of them was brontosaurus, the thunder lizard. Another was the biggest dinosaur of all time, brachiosaurus (5). (5) Brachiosaurus has long since been eclipsed by a number of titanosaurs, the largest confirmed as of 30 Dec 2020 being Patagotitan mayorum. Brontosaurus is a whole different issue. This content is outdated and still plagiarized.
These giants were from a group called the sauropods, and they all had the same body plan—small head, long neck, round body, and sweeping tail. This same body plan worked just as well in the water (6). (6) It’s not the same body plan, as almost all plesiosaurs lack the “sweeping tail.” Also, still plagiarized.
The plesiosaurs looked like the famed Loch Ness Monster, with a snake-like neck on a massive body (7). (7) This seems really helpful as a visualization tool, except so many shapes have been reported for the supposed creature that this comparison relies on the reader sharing the same understanding of it.
(8) Unlike the Loch Ness Monster, though, plesiosaurs were real! Sadly, though, they have no living relatives (“Baby”). (8) Hurray! Evidence. There is a weird interjection here—why is it sad that plesiosaurs have no living relatives? If this is relevant to an argument being built it might belong, but otherwise it’s just a personal interjection.
Plesiosaurs were more than just sea monsters, though. (9) (9) Still no source is provided for any of this underlined stuff.
They were likely caring parents. First, it’s not like a flippered creature is going to crawl onto land in order to lay eggs (10). (10) Sea turtles say hi! Well no, they don’t, because they can’t process language, but their existence does refute this passage.
This means that the plesiosaurs likely needed to give birth to live young, just like mammals (11). (11) Leaving aside sea turtles, there is a logical fallacy of hasty generalization going on here—that because two creatures share one trait (viviparity), that they must share other traits (post-birth parent care). Additionally, not all mammals give birth to live young.
Mammals are famous for the fact that we care for our young (12). (12) Multiple species that engage in viviparity do not exhibit parental care.
Additionally, a study done by Robin O’Keefe discovered that newborn plesiosaurs needed care to survive (13). (13) Which study? O’Keefe did not author the only cited article, and the only quotation cites O’Keefe. This is confusing. The essay needs to make it clear where information is coming from.
Robin (14) explains (14) This is rude. In general, people are given the courtesy of being referred to by their familial name.
(15) “Our study also reaches the novel conclusion that plesiosaur fetal bone grew extremely quickly, sacrificing bone strength for growth rate. Plesiosaur babies may have needed maternal care for protection.” (15) Where? It turns out that this is a quotation from the article cited at the end, but that needs to be made clear.
She (16) points out that while plesiosaurs were big, they could not have fended for themselves. (16) Robin O’Keefe is male, and prefers the pronouns he, him, and his. The author of the essay has made an assumption based on the typical pronoun associated with a first name.

 

So, this essay again creates problems for itself out of carelessness. Many of these problems could have been prevented if the student simply wrote from evidence instead of writing from personal “knowledge” and then patching in sources.

 

 

License

Research, Evidence, and Written Arguments Copyright © by jsunderb. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book